<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Single Form Problem with ASP.NET</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brennan.offwhite.net/blog/2004/08/04/the-single-form-problem-with-aspnet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brennan.offwhite.net/blog/2004/08/04/the-single-form-problem-with-aspnet/</link>
	<description>My Experiences with Software Development</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 07:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Deepesh</title>
		<link>http://brennan.offwhite.net/blog/2004/08/04/the-single-form-problem-with-aspnet/#comment-20889</link>
		<dc:creator>Deepesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brennanwp.offwhite.net/blog/?p=30#comment-20889</guid>
		<description>Hello,

I tried this in firefox, But it dosent worked for me.
Any help in FireFox?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I tried this in firefox, But it dosent worked for me.<br />
Any help in FireFox?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norbert Colon</title>
		<link>http://brennan.offwhite.net/blog/2004/08/04/the-single-form-problem-with-aspnet/#comment-19904</link>
		<dc:creator>Norbert Colon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brennanwp.offwhite.net/blog/?p=30#comment-19904</guid>
		<description>My users were moaning about an ASP application refreshing the screen when they pressed the 'Enter' key.  
I stuck in your JavaScript, tweaked it a bit to act on different buttons depending on what page was displayed,
and it worked a treat


Many Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My users were moaning about an ASP application refreshing the screen when they pressed the 'Enter' key.<br />
I stuck in your JavaScript, tweaked it a bit to act on different buttons depending on what page was displayed,<br />
and it worked a treat</p>
<p>Many Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fallout Guy</title>
		<link>http://brennan.offwhite.net/blog/2004/08/04/the-single-form-problem-with-aspnet/#comment-7362</link>
		<dc:creator>Fallout Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brennanwp.offwhite.net/blog/?p=30#comment-7362</guid>
		<description>Hey, great solution! This worked perfectly for me.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, great solution! This worked perfectly for me.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Church</title>
		<link>http://brennan.offwhite.net/blog/2004/08/04/the-single-form-problem-with-aspnet/#comment-4014</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 11:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brennanwp.offwhite.net/blog/?p=30#comment-4014</guid>
		<description>A simple and effective solution. Thanks very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A simple and effective solution. Thanks very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BreeZBaCK</title>
		<link>http://brennan.offwhite.net/blog/2004/08/04/the-single-form-problem-with-aspnet/#comment-1815</link>
		<dc:creator>BreeZBaCK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brennanwp.offwhite.net/blog/?p=30#comment-1815</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Thanks for this great tip. I've found a similar approach in ITTopics:


But, I wonder if anyone has found a solution which wouldn't require to add code for any textbox that we add on the form. Any ideas?

You are welcome to email me, after posting your reply on this blog!

Thanks :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Thanks for this great tip. I've found a similar approach in ITTopics:</p>
<p>But, I wonder if anyone has found a solution which wouldn't require to add code for any textbox that we add on the form. Any ideas?</p>
<p>You are welcome to email me, after posting your reply on this blog!</p>
<p>Thanks <img src='http://brennan.offwhite.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://brennan.offwhite.net/blog/2004/08/04/the-single-form-problem-with-aspnet/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brennanwp.offwhite.net/blog/?p=30#comment-37</guid>
		<description>WOW, I slapped this code into my  tag, and solved all my issues. Thanks so much.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW, I slapped this code into my  tag, and solved all my issues. Thanks so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Roberts</title>
		<link>http://brennan.offwhite.net/blog/2004/08/04/the-single-form-problem-with-aspnet/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brennanwp.offwhite.net/blog/?p=30#comment-36</guid>
		<description>This worked great. Thanks for such an elegent solution.

My only issue now is that the second "default" button does not "highlight" when I enter the textbox like the actualy default button of the form does. Do you know any way to accomplish this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This worked great. Thanks for such an elegent solution.</p>
<p>My only issue now is that the second "default" button does not "highlight" when I enter the textbox like the actualy default button of the form does. Do you know any way to accomplish this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://brennan.offwhite.net/blog/2004/08/04/the-single-form-problem-with-aspnet/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brennanwp.offwhite.net/blog/?p=30#comment-35</guid>
		<description>OH MY GOD YOU ARE A GENIUS!!!  thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OH MY GOD YOU ARE A GENIUS!!!  thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ara</title>
		<link>http://brennan.offwhite.net/blog/2004/08/04/the-single-form-problem-with-aspnet/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Ara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2005 13:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brennanwp.offwhite.net/blog/?p=30#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Thanks! It is the best explained solution to the problem I've read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! It is the best explained solution to the problem I've read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brennan Stehling</title>
		<link>http://brennan.offwhite.net/blog/2004/08/04/the-single-form-problem-with-aspnet/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Brennan Stehling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2005 20:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brennanwp.offwhite.net/blog/?p=30#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Those examples were just static files created in VI actually.  In VS.NET 2005 they have updated it to DTD aware.  It will validate your code against live schema and underscore any invalid markup.  They also come up as warnings during compilation.  The entire time I have used VS.NET 2005 so far I have only use XHTML 1.0 Transistional simply because I still want to code to be like HTML 4 but have the XML rules enforced.  This allows me to do some things in Javascript more reliably.

Also, I have noticed that Firefox behaves badly with the above example lately.  I need to recode it and post an update about the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those examples were just static files created in VI actually.  In VS.NET 2005 they have updated it to DTD aware.  It will validate your code against live schema and underscore any invalid markup.  They also come up as warnings during compilation.  The entire time I have used VS.NET 2005 so far I have only use XHTML 1.0 Transistional simply because I still want to code to be like HTML 4 but have the XML rules enforced.  This allows me to do some things in Javascript more reliably.</p>
<p>Also, I have noticed that Firefox behaves badly with the above example lately.  I need to recode it and post an update about the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
