<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google ramping up Java, Predictions&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brennan.offwhite.net/blog/2004/08/24/google-ramping-up-java-predictions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brennan.offwhite.net/blog/2004/08/24/google-ramping-up-java-predictions/</link>
	<description>My Experiences with Software Development</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://brennan.offwhite.net/blog/2004/08/24/google-ramping-up-java-predictions/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brennanwp.offwhite.net/blog/?p=32#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Cool topic. If I may add some speculations:

a) 'google' your hard drive application. Now, the G hasn't been too good when it comes to cross-platform apps (the IE toolbar), but using Java may allow them some freedom from the vicissitudes of Microsoft -- and you know M$ is gunning for them.

b) tools for developers. M$'s great success is at least partially built on giving developers what they want: great tools. As you suggested with Eclipse, perhaps the idea is too build easy-to-use tools. For instance to build custom apps which hook into google web services.

c) file sharing. 'google your peers'. They could increase their power by making an app that becomes THE way to transfer files and share/search data.

d) extend the google appliance. This is really speculative, but what about extending the search engine to run second-order stuff on a distributed farm of perhaps millions of volunteer PC's? For instance, crunching through indeces to improve the results of a particular topic, weed out page rank abusers, etc.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool topic. If I may add some speculations:</p>
<p>a) 'google' your hard drive application. Now, the G hasn't been too good when it comes to cross-platform apps (the IE toolbar), but using Java may allow them some freedom from the vicissitudes of Microsoft -- and you know M$ is gunning for them.</p>
<p>b) tools for developers. M$'s great success is at least partially built on giving developers what they want: great tools. As you suggested with Eclipse, perhaps the idea is too build easy-to-use tools. For instance to build custom apps which hook into google web services.</p>
<p>c) file sharing. 'google your peers'. They could increase their power by making an app that becomes THE way to transfer files and share/search data.</p>
<p>d) extend the google appliance. This is really speculative, but what about extending the search engine to run second-order stuff on a distributed farm of perhaps millions of volunteer PC's? For instance, crunching through indeces to improve the results of a particular topic, weed out page rank abusers, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brennan Stehling</title>
		<link>http://brennan.offwhite.net/blog/2004/08/24/google-ramping-up-java-predictions/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Brennan Stehling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brennanwp.offwhite.net/blog/?p=32#comment-54</guid>
		<description>I guess I just assumed it was using WebKit since that just makes sense, but I can see iTunes screens do more than what a web page would do.  Maybe it is some kind of XML rendering implementation.  But my point still is the same, a browser with plugins is just a powerful application.  Firefox/Mozilla can do many things with XPCOM, but Java plugins would provide a much richer framework than just XPCOM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I just assumed it was using WebKit since that just makes sense, but I can see iTunes screens do more than what a web page would do.  Maybe it is some kind of XML rendering implementation.  But my point still is the same, a browser with plugins is just a powerful application.  Firefox/Mozilla can do many things with XPCOM, but Java plugins would provide a much richer framework than just XPCOM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy McArthur</title>
		<link>http://brennan.offwhite.net/blog/2004/08/24/google-ramping-up-java-predictions/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy McArthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brennanwp.offwhite.net/blog/?p=32#comment-53</guid>
		<description>iTunes may not be what you think it is:
http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/hyatt/archives/2004_06.html#005666</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iTunes may not be what you think it is:<br />
<a href="http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/hyatt/archives/2004_06.html#005666" rel="nofollow">http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/hyatt/archives/2004_06.html#005666</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
